It was a really interesting
discussion last night and as Adesola said at the end,
probably the most fluid conversation we have had. If nothing else the pandemic has given us a lot of practice at communicating through Skype and Zoom, which seemed
to help us
navigate the conversation.
My area of research
at the moment is embodied
knowledge, not just how this applies to the dancer but to our whole life. Husserl tells us
that:
'Every perceiving consciousness has this peculiarity,
that it is the consciousness
of the embodied self-presence of an individual object'. (Husserl 1931)
By this I understand him to mean that
none of us are free-floating consciousnesses wafting through life, we are
embodied in our living-selves. Everything we do and everything we learn is
through our bodily experience, nothing comes to us
just as thought, we understand things through the experiences we
have.
These experiences lead to an embodied
knowledge, for me this means, that what our body
understands is equal or greater
than the sum of the thoughts we have about this.
For example, take
snooker players; with each shot they
must embody the principles of mathematics,
wikihow neatly demonstrates the
many mathematical principles at work
when taking a shot.
https://www.wikihow.com/Play-Pool-Like-a-Mathematician#Calculating-the-Angle-to-Strike-an-Object-Ball
However, most snooker players are not working out formulas before each shot, they take it based on their embodied knowledge of how to take that shot. If the snooker player decided to investigate the mathematical principles at play, they would think 'of course I understand that' because it would make sense to their embodied understanding of the game. Importantly the mathematical principles were developed out of human experience, the experience came first and the theory to articulate and understand it came second
It is exactly the
same for philosophy. The theories we are grappling with now came out of lived experiences and the desire to explain the 'why, what
and how' of that experience. What I find really
fascinating about this MA learning journey is the 'Of Course' moments. These moments occur
when I read
something that articulates ideas I already understand
through my lived experience, but possibly couldn't articulate them as well as Dewey, Husserl,
Heidegger...
When I am tackling a text, which I think is new learning, sometimes instead
of thinking 'oh yes now I understand' I think 'of course'
because I intrinsically
recognise my experience in the new learning. These texts and theories
resonate with me and form the framework that
underpin the ideas I am now researching.
Everyone's MA journey will be different and personal, I am endlessly fascinated to hear all of your ideas and experiences - Thank you